Led by youth, protestors across the country blame the government for the attack and others like it. On the Ayotzinapa campus where they wait for news of their sons, one of the fathers told me, “The government knows where they are,” in a voice heavy with fatigue and grief.
On the night of September 26, police patrol cars from the city of Iguala blocked the buses his son and other students were traveling in, and opened fire on the students. During the night, more students from Ayotzinapa arrived to rescue their companions, and members of the state teachers’ union came to help. The shooting went on. In a bizarre series of events, an armed commando attacked the students in the same spot hours later.
Nearby, a third attack–on a local soccer team possibly mistaken for Ayotzinapa students — left another youth and two others dead. Videotapes in the hands of the Guerrero state prosecutor’s office reportedly show that local police also participated in this attack. Federal police arrived at the scene at least two hours later and refused to attend to the wounded.
By all accounts, law enforcement agents limited their activities to firing on the students and carrying off the 43 who are now disappeared. No law enforcement officials – at local, state, or federal levels — protected the young people under attack, despite massive deployment to fight the war on drugs. Survivors report that they carried the wounded to a nearby army base, where army personnel refused to aid them. Not one soldier stepped forward to try to stop the massacre of the youth.
The Tlachinollan Human Rights Center of Guerrero issued an urgent alert on September 29 stating, “These events demonstrate an excessive use of force and an intention to deliberately extrajudicially execute students by the Municipal Police and an omission on the part of state and federal authorities for failing to implement appropriate security measures that would have prevented a second aggression and the disappearance of 55 local students.” (43 remain missing, as 12 were subsequently located alive).
Why Did the Mass Shooting Occur?
It may be impossible to logically fit together all the pieces of who ordered the attack and why, mainly because they attackers may not have acted logically.
We know that the ambush was planned beforehand and that it targeted the Ayotzinapa students. Beyond that there is a hot debate over whether organized crime ordered the local police under their power to attack, or the government used its relations with organized crime to terrorize and murder the students.
To make matters more complex, within that debate there is a consensus that the line between organized crime and government in the city was long ago erased by collusion between the two. The attorney general recently announced that investigations showed the mayor of Iguala ordered the attack on the students. He is accused of having close ties to the regional organized crime cartel Guerreros Unidos, allegedly run by his wife’s brothers until two of them were assassinated and the third went into hiding.
The government is also blamed because it has entirely failed to keep the peace in Guerrero, a state that combines the worst aspects of government abuse and criminal violence. The area outside Iguala is one of the most important drug production regions of the country. The state’s political corruption guarantees protection and impunity. Its history of opposition, including by armed groups, makes it a nodal center for repression as well.
The local, state, and federal governments have been hostile to the rural school for years. Founded in the post-revolutionary period for children of peasant families, the school has staunchly defended revolutionary values as a series of governments has moved to privatize, globalize, and atomize Mexican society. The students protested the recent education reforms modeled after U.S. programs. When they were attacked, they were raising funds to participate in a march to commemorate the Oct. 2, 1968 massacre of students at Tlatelolco.
Young men from impoverished rural families with revolutionary ideals and a penchant for direct action are the natural enemies of politicians building new kinds of state-business ties – especially ties that include the business of illegal drug trafficking.
There are also precedents for these events. On December 12, 2011, state and federal police shot and killed Ayotzinapa students Gabriel Echeverría de Jesús and Jorge Alexis Herrera Pino at a roadblock. No one was ever held responsible.
The criminal group Guerreros Unidos, an ultraviolent splinter from the Beltran Leyva cartel, had a less obvious motive to abduct the students but more capacity to carry out the crime. The history of Guerreros Unidos reveals the insanity of the war on drugs. As U.S.-backed security forces arrested or assassinated successive cartel leaders to enforce U.S. prohibition, the splinter groups went rogue and used territorial control as carte blanche for any criminal activity that benefited them. Embroiled in a turf war with Los Rojos in Chilpancingo, the Guerreros Unidos could have ordered the hit for a number of reasons without necessarily thinking through the consequences, which now include 50 members of their cartel arrested in the past three weeks.
But the students are convinced that the criminal group is not behind the killings. A student who prefers to remain anonymous due to the climate of persecution that exists, stated, “This was the government because they’re the only pigs that would dare to kill innocents like that. Criminals kill each other. Not the government: the government attacks the people directly.”
Regardless of the actual interplay between state and criminal organizations, this is typical of youth reaction in Mexico. The Ayotzinapa massacre and disappearances occurred just months after the army killed 22 youth in Tlatlaya in circumstances that suggest extrajudicial executions. In marches and on social networks, young people express a sense of being under attack.
Clash of Images
In Iguala, reality reared its ugly head just as the international press was tripping over itself to praise the well-groomed president. The Peña administration has spent millions of dollars to improve its image, hiring the U.S. lobbying firms Chlopak, Leonard, Schechter & Associates and APCO public relations, among others. Part of that effort has been a calculated move to downplay the violence and the war on drugs of Peña’s predecessor’s, which had become a political liability. The U.S. government has encouraged a new public emphasis on economic reforms and cultural ties, while still directing the majority of its aid to the war on drugs.
But despite his overdue declarations to investigate and punish the perpetrators of the Ayotzinapa attack, Peña Nieto has a dilemma on his hands. A full investigation and prosecution would undoubtedly touch members of his own cabinet — particularly Attorney General Jesus Murillo Karam and Secretary of the Interior Miguel Angel Osorio Chong. The attorney general’s office allowed Iguala mayor José Luis Abarcato to escape and now admits there were errors in digging up 28 bodies from a clandestine grave that informants said were the students. Murillo Karam reported that DNA testing showed the bodies are not the missing students, although tests continue.
The federal government also did not respond to many warning signs regarding corruption and illegal acts in Iguala and the region. In a too-little, too-late measure, federal police were sent out to take control of 13 municipalities suspected of ties to organized crime. Security forces under the Secretary of the Interior failed — by all appearances purposefully — to protect the students.
The parents of the missing students and many others accuse the government of being more concerned with its image than with finding the kids. They say that the government is not carrying out an earnest search and instead is trying to wear them down in hopes the scandal–and their hopes of ever finding their sons–will fade away.
But sweeping the scandal under the rug of oblivion and mass media control is not an option in this case. This time, hundreds of thousands of youth throughout the country will not take spin for an answer.
On October 22, Mexican youth and people throughout the world joined in demanding that the students be brought back alive. Nothing is as important as this demand. It’s essential for the families, for the reputation of the nation, and for restoring a modicum of faith in the government. If the students have been murdered, their families also have a right to know as soon as possible.
After that, huge challenges will remain. The Mexican government must begin to enforce the law, even against those with money and power. And the U.S. government must finally face up to its responsibility to suspend the Merida Initiative’s security aid to Mexican forces that murder their own youth.
Laura Carlsen is the director of the Americas Program in Mexico City. She is editor of the Americas Updater. This column, with minor changes, first appeared in Foreign Policy in Focus.