President Obama has replaced his senior Latin American advisor, Dan Restrepo, because of embarrassing heat the president took over his drug war and Cuba policies at the mid-April Summit of the Americas in Cartagena, Colombia.

“He was upset by the trip,” according to a Democratic insider who follows Latin American affairs, “and so they got rid of Restepo.” Central and Latin American leaders openly challenged Obama at the Summit, including his Colombian host, president Juan Manuel Santos. Led by Brazil and Ecuador, the summit leaders also indicated that they would not attend future meetings unless Cuba is seated.

More than ever, Latin American governments appear to be showing muscle as they realize that returns on dialogue with the US are scant. By contrast, when Obama became president, Latin America – including the Cubans and Venezuelans – was between hopeful and exuberant about prospects for a new Good Neighbor policy.

Those days are over for now. Challenges from democratically elected regimes in the region are posing significant obstacles to traditional US hegemony. Ten years ago, Latin America rejected the US plan for a continental free-trade zone with proposed headquarters in Miami. Since then, several Latin American governments have developed autonomous regional institutions such as Mercosur, led by Brazil and including Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay. This week Mercosur admitted Venezuela, the target of a virtual US Cold War. Paraguay’s conservative Senate had blocked Venezuela’s admission until the recent coup in Paraguay, which led to its suspension of Mercosur.

Latin America’s people and governments have rejected US policies of blockade and de facto regime change in Cuba. They additionally oppose the 2009 coup in Hondurans, widely seen as US-supported.

The same forces are moving away from US-sponsored military solutions to the drugs problem, and toward experiments in legalization. In an unusual change of the dynamics, many Mexicans led by the poet Javier Sicilia will be caravanning across the United States to the White House this fall, bringing their opposition to the drug war to its source in the DEA.

The result is an Obama administration, originally supportive of dialogue and diplomacy, defensive and isolated on key issues from democratically elected governments to the South.

The replacement of Restrepo by career diplomat Ricardo Zuniga, a Honduran long involved in US Cuban affairs, does not mean any change in policy. With the House under Republican control, Latin American issues are under the purview of Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Miami Cuban extremist who has called for killing Fidel Castro and given support to the most extreme elements in her community.

If Obama gets elected a second term, it means an opportunity. He understands now that it is against the US national interest to pursue drug wars and the obsolete Cuba policy when there are significant costs.

Tom Hayden is founder and Director of the Peace and Justice Resource Center in Culver City, CA., which originally produced this article. He has over fifty years of activism, politics and writing and continues to be a leading voice for peace, economic justice, saving the environment and reforming politics through a more participatory democracy.

For more information:

Doing Biden’s Bidding


  • Mario Salzmann
    Posted August 14, 2012 12:31 pm 0Likes

    What will Zuñiga be able to do that Restrepo was unable to do?
    How did Restrepo fail? How will Zuñiga succeed where Restrepo failed?

  • Mary Day Kent
    Posted August 15, 2012 12:09 pm 0Likes

    Very good article and summary of the LA policy under Obama so far: such an unnecessary waste of opportunity. However, the last sentence comes from nowhere to offer optimism for a second term. What evidence is there for any awareness or willingness to change?

  • JJ García
    Posted August 15, 2012 11:13 pm 0Likes

    If one will re-read or read for the first time The Tragedy of American Diplomacy by William Appleman Williams his thesis which I support states that the “Good Neighbor” and its bastard child “Alliance for Progress” were nothing other than ruses to mask the earlier “Open Notes” or “Open Door Policy”. Making the world the U.S. market open for business at the U.S. oligarchy’s whim and fancy is what has ruled the roost since in 1898 we took over Cuba, Philippines, etc.

    The same policy is still in effect, but the impact has no punch. Restrepo, experientially and academically has very little experience in Latin America other than his Colombian surname. Zuñiga is just another hack who was waiting in the wings, a sort of Obama Democrat Bolton mixed with Otto Reich. In essence, if you might ask the Cuba’s this turn has done Latin America a huge favor. Obama has gone back to the old worn out cold war play book. And William Appleman Williams Tragedy of American Diplomacy is possibly more appropriate not then ever before. As it stands and as the U.S. carries on with this clumsy, disrespectful, disingenuous manner. Latin America should have a future where sovereignty will be firmly cemented.

  • Trackback: Commentary: Romney’s policy on Latin America: Not much to look at | The Washington Panafrican
  • Patricia
    Posted August 20, 2012 8:43 am 0Likes

    President Obama had plenty of opportunity to get it right at the beginning of his term. Regardless if he wins a second term or not, that opportunity will not present itself again. I am proud to see the growing unity among Latin American countries. After all, they are sovereign nations and not westerners background.

    As someone from the region, I am quite disgusted by the Obama’s Administration arrogance and ignorance.

  • Trackback: Weekly News Summary | Inter-Faith Committee on Latin America
  • Trackback: Global systemic crisis/October 2012 – The global economy sucked into a black hole and world geopolitics heated to white-hot | LEAP E2020

Comments are closed.