Photo Credit: The Mountain Forum in Latin America

The New England Complex Systems Institute, that has developed a quantitative model able to very closely predicted the FAO’s food price index, released a new report predicting sharply higher food prices due in part to excessive speculation.

Their model, originally released in September 2011 matched the FAO’s index from 2004 to 2011. Since then it has continued to closely follow the real world numbers.

Unfortunately, the model now predicts, “another speculative bubble starting by the end of 2012 and causing food prices to rise even higher than recent peaks”

While the researchers acknowledge that the drought in the Midwest U.S. will cause prices to rise, their model shows that excessive speculative activity will have an even larger effect. Though some key financial reforms passed in 2010 may finally begin to be implemented in early 2013, that may be too late to avoid the coming price bubble.

“We find that through the mechanism of speculative activity, the drought may trigger the third massive price spike to occur earlier than otherwise expected, beginning immediately, and sooner than could be prevented by the anticipated new regulations. This spike may raise prices well beyond an increase justified by the reduced supply caused by the droughts… [w]hile the drought only causes a limited price shock, the impact on prices is amplified by the speculative activity,” write the authors.

Graph showing the dramatic difference that speculation can make in food prices

As NECSI president Bar-Yam said, “We are on the verge of another crisis, the third in five years, and likely to be the worst yet, capable of causing new food riots and turmoil on a par with the Arab Spring, alluding to another study by the NECSI showing that the last two food prices bubbles in 2008 and 2011 correlated with similar increases in violent outbreaks and food riots.

Graph showing the number of violent outbreaks rising and falling with food prices

Perhaps most frustrating is that the principal causes of the rising prices are bad public policy:

“Each of these causes is due to particular acts of government intervention or deregulation. Thus, while the food supply and prices may be vulnerable to global population increases and environmental change, the existing price increases are due to specific governmental policies. In order to prevent further crises in the food market, we recommended the halting of government support for ethanol conversion and the reversal of
commodities market deregulation, which enables unlimited financial speculation.”

Could it be that we are in for another round of unnecessary, destabilizing and dehumanizing violence?

David Kane is an associate for Latin America in the Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns, where he also works on international trade and economic issues. He served for nine and a half years as a Maryknoll lay missioner in Joao Pessoa, Brazil and worked with the Jubilee Brazil campaign, a coalition of social organizations that mobilizes Brazilian society around the issues of debt, free trade and militarization. He is a frequent contributor to the CIP Americas Program.

1 Comment

  • James Norton
    Posted April 14, 2016 2:44 am 0Likes

    It’s shameful that speculative business and politics have gotten such a say not only in what people put on the table, but general stability of civil societies. I’ve never seen this graph, the one that shows the relation between violent outbreaks and change in food price, and there’s absolutely nothing surprising about it. Unfortunately, we always get stuck on the violence and fail to see the representation of a society pushed too far.

    James Norton,

Comments are closed.