Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office spurred evaluations, parodies, criticisms and a few celebratory rallies, mostly organized by Trump himself. The 100 days produced 142 executive orders, a global trade war, a record stock market decline, a plummeting dollar, an economic downturn, 121,000 government employers on Elon Musk’s chopping block, and a flurry of diplomatic crises. The sheer scale of changes, enabled by a massive presidential power grab, has left the world reeling.



Pundits have called this onslaught a “shock and awe” tactic —a show of overwhelming force and breadth aimed at stunning and confusing the enemy. Steve Bannon apparently coined the phrase “flood the zone” to refer to multi-front attacks that divide and distract the opposition from a hidden core strategy. In the United States, the tactic is working to a certain extent so far. Issue-based organizations—environmentalists, human rights groups, feminists, economic justice activists, immigrant rights, pro-democracy forces—have become so accustomed to working in silos that the across-the-board offensive has left them not knowing where to start.

To those of us watching from what is a not-at-all safe distance, it’s like being trapped in a room with a monkey playing with a loaded gun. Here in Mexico, we’ve been on constant alert to try to dodge the next bullet. Monthly tariff threats have been the biggest part of it, but so have other issues. President Claudia Sheinbaum has announced diplomatic notes to ask Trump: not to send Mexican migrants to Guantánamo (!), to explain details of his planned military base on the shared border, and to protest meddling remarks on Mexican internal affairs from a Trump official at a UN meeting.

Sheinbaum also banned Sec. of the Interior Kristi Noem’s racist anti-immigrant spots, threatened counter-tariffs (which she did not impose) and denounced Trump’s bully tactics. The Mexican president’s responses to Trump’s threats have gained her a reputation in many Latin American countries as leader in standing up to Donald Trump. The reality shows more capitulation than the rhetoric might imply, but even the rhetoric is a refreshing change from her predecessor Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s gushing praise for Mexico’s nemesis during Trump’s first term.

Those who predicted the worst for a leftist woman president of an economically dependent country up against a misogynist sex offender and billionaire capitalist have so far been proven wrong. But threat-triggered negotiations—a key part of Trump’s transactional politics— will continue to create tension. And there is another pillar of Trump policy that Sheinbaum hasn’t had to face yet: his extreme right anti-gender policy.

Centering anti-gender ideology and practice

Given Trump’s bombastic and semi-incoherent communication style, his initial actions can seem like the spewing of an unhinged and way-too-powerful megalomaniac. But we’d be dead wrong to think there’s no method to this madness. Trump and his team are brilliant strategists; they have a plan and a vision.

The plan features three long-range goals: First, to concentrate even more global wealth among oligarchs, especially the president’s family and friends. This is advancing rapidly by defunding programs with a common good focus and channeling state funds to the super-rich, by deepening inequality, and by grabbing up natural resources still in the public domain.

The second is to use U.S. global muscle to reinforce imperialism at the service of the first goal. Here we see the withdrawal from multilateral institutions and attacks on South-South ties and efforts to take control over Panama, Greenland, Canada, Gaza and Ukraine.

The third, is the brutal reinforcement of patriarchy.

Several key actions reveal the strategic importance of patriarchy for extreme right movements. On his first day in office, Trump issued the Executive Order Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government”. The order decrees that the U.S. government only recognizes two unchangeable biological sexes. It condems “gender ideology” as the “false claim” that gender based on sex is a fluid and socially constructed category, and it orders “gender” purged from all government procedures, documents and funding.

Trump’s anti-gender policies have largely been treated as sideline politics. Analysts for the most part consider the attacks on women’s rights as either the personal obsessions of a macho ruler, or a hook for building a base among disaffected males. The campaign against women as equal, autonomous beings gets chalked up to “culture wars”–as if gender roles and gender oppression formed part of a “superstructure” that plays a minor role in disputes over real economic and political power. These explanations have a grain of truth, but they ignore the radical nature of the far-right’s plan for women (as far as its plan for sexual diversities, that can be summed up in one word: disappear).

Trump announced the Order in his inaugural address: “This week, I will also end the government policy of trying to socially engineer race and gender into every aspect of public and private life. We will forge a society that is colorblind and merit-based.” From a historic colonialist point of view, there’s a Machiavellian logic here: Over centuries they violently impose a system that designates and discriminates against members of the human race based on race and sex. Then they claim it doesn’t exist and declare the Grand-Canyon-like chasms a level playing field. In racist and sexist societies like ours, “colorblind and merit-based” is code for locking in patriarchy and white supremacy.

With the subsequent elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, the federal government now hunts down and fires anyone using they/them pronouns or working in gender justice. National and international grants that supported women and minority-led business have been rescinded. Anti-abortion fanatics sentenced for violent attacks on clinics and patients recieved a presidential pardon, and a nationwide abortion ban is still looming. By prohibiting any acknowledgement of patriarchal discrimination and all programs that address it, the right has launched an international campaign to create the unassailably male-dominated world that Trump’s followers in the manosphere yearn for.

Anti-gender policies South-of-the-Border

For Latin America, Javier Milei’s speech at the Davos Forum marked a second defining moment in the right’s anti-gender plan. The far-right Argentine president launched a diatribe against liberals, the State, the “aberrant idea of social justice” and “positive rights”. Among his incendiary remarks against “woke-ism”, he claimed that “radical feminism is a distortion of the concept of equality.” Milei referred to programs of affirmative action as “inverse colonization” and echoing a recurrent far-right talking point he added: “In its most extreme version, gender ideology constitutes quite simply child abuse—they’re pedophiles”.

The speech sparked the largest protest march to date against Milei. It was announced as the “The Federal LGBTQ+ Pride-Antifascist-Antiracist March” and mobilized by feminist and LGBTQ+ organizations throughout the country. Over a million people hit the streets, moved by audacity of the threats against their very existence.

Milei isn’t the only Trump trumpeter in the region. El Salvador president Nayib Bukele used to support women’s right to abortion, but he did an about-face when he realized that he could get political and financial support from the international far right for his antidemocratic project if he took a hardline against abortion and women’s rights. Now despite an Inter-American court ruling that El Salvador’s abortion policy violates human rights, Bukele has repeatedly stated that he will never lift the draconian abortion ban. For jumping on the bandwagon, Trump has sent him millions of dollars to lock up foreign immigrants, many of whom have not been charged with a crime or stood trial.

Latin America Stands Up

So far, Latin American nations have not had to directly confront the U.S. president on gender policy. Mexico decriminalized abortion and continues to advance on free access. President Sheinbaum signed the decree for the substantive equity for women in the constitution, which recognizes “historic inequalities” and mandates guaranteeing equal access to women. The government also formally has a Feminist Foreign Policy. Colombia has adopted a “National Policy on Gender Equity”. The Community of Latin American and Caribbean Countries listed “gender equality” among its top priorities.

There’s renewed hope as we face this onslaught from the north. The concerted attack is bringing us together. When have we seen millions in the streets marching under the banner of “Antifascist-Antiracist-LGBTQ+ Pride”?



This is the column The Bad Neighbor by Laura Carlsen, director of Mira: Feminisms and Democracies. It was originally published in Spanish for the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation. Mira has permission to distribute its English translation.

FEATURED

Democracies

Back to protectionism

The World in Focus | Analysis column Thirty-five years after the US authorities officially launched the ten liberal principles that were to